Functional Performance Using Eye Control and Single Switch Scanning by People With ALS Eye control and switch scanning are commonly considered as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) access options by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at the same clinical intervention point. Choosing optimal access methods must be supported by performance and qualitative feedback, as well as considerations of cognitive changes sometimes associated ... Article
Article  |   September 01, 2010
Functional Performance Using Eye Control and Single Switch Scanning by People With ALS
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Chris Gibbons
    Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
  • Erin Beneteau
    Seattle, WA
Article Information
Augmentative & Alternative Communication / Articles
Article   |   September 01, 2010
Functional Performance Using Eye Control and Single Switch Scanning by People With ALS
SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, September 2010, Vol. 19, 64-69. doi:10.1044/aac19.3.64
SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, September 2010, Vol. 19, 64-69. doi:10.1044/aac19.3.64
Abstract

Eye control and switch scanning are commonly considered as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) access options by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at the same clinical intervention point. Choosing optimal access methods must be supported by performance and qualitative feedback, as well as considerations of cognitive changes sometimes associated with ALS. We present quantitative and qualitative data comparing access methods used by five people with ALS and five adults without ALS. Each participant accessed an on-screen keyboard during repeated exposure to two conditions: single switch scanning and eye control. Participants were required to copy sentences presented on a computer screen. Keyboard letter organization was held constant between conditions, and rate enhancement and word prediction techniques were not used. Measures of speed and accuracy revealed a significant speed advantage for eye control and a significant accuracy advantage for single switch scanning. Speed and accuracy for both access methods improved with practice. Predictably, people with ALS performed significantly slower than participants without ALS using both access methods. Participants rated eye control as the more efficient access method overall. Participants without ALS rated both access methods significantly more fatiguing than people with ALS. Post study interviews revealed that eye control was the preferred access option for people with ALS. Clinical implications and extensions of this study are discussed.

Become a SIG Affiliate
Pay Per View
Entire SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication content & archive
24-hour access
This Issue
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access
We've Changed Our Publication Model...
The 19 individual SIG Perspectives publications have been relaunched as the new, all-in-one Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.