Criteria for Grading Evidence: What Makes Sense for AAC? Evidence-based practice pertaining to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions requires a consideration of clinical expertise and stakeholder preferences in conjunction with the highest quality of research evidence available (Dollaghan, 2004; Schlosser, 2003; Schlosser & Raghavendra, 2004). With respect to the latter, there appears to be an unfortunate bias ... Article
Article  |   September 01, 2006
Criteria for Grading Evidence: What Makes Sense for AAC?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jan L. Bedrosian
    Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI
Article Information
Augmentative & Alternative Communication / Evidence-Based Practice
Article   |   September 01, 2006
Criteria for Grading Evidence: What Makes Sense for AAC?
SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, September 2006, Vol. 15, 15-19. doi:10.1044/aac15.3.15
SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, September 2006, Vol. 15, 15-19. doi:10.1044/aac15.3.15
Acknowledgment
The author would like to express her sincere appreciation to Ralf Schlosser for his constructive feedback regarding this paper. Thanks are also extended to the insightful and enthusiastic participants of this think-tank session.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Become a SIG Affiliate
Pay Per View
Entire SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication content & archive
24-hour access
This Issue
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access
We've Changed Our Publication Model...
The 19 individual SIG Perspectives publications have been relaunched as the new, all-in-one Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.